Opa1612 vs opa2134 vs opa21

Opa1612 vs opa2134 vs opa21. When the original OP is Bipolar(like NE5532 etc) we can most always replace with FET or another similar Bipolar OP. JohnYang1997 May 30, 2007 · If the orginal OP is a FET (like TL072, OPA2134 etc) we may be careful sometimes NOT possible to replace with Bipolar (like NE5532 etc). I also refurbish large format recording consoles. 2V inside the negative rail and 2. 2022-05-15 10:48 am #1 Nov 30, 2021 · Aol for the OPA2134 with a 600 ohm load has an output swing that is 2. THD+N level of all right channels is almost identical at -94 dBV. But deep bass and transients seem more punchy in the OPA2134. Since i couldnt find an opa2134, i just use tl072 and the likes for our projects I am just curious how opa2134's output performance. It is difficult to say which one is better. Products Precision op amps (Vos<1mV) INA1620 — High-fidelity audio operational amplifier with integrated thin-film resistors and EMI filtering OPA130 — Single, 1-MHz, 20-pA bias current, 530-µA power, FET operational amplifier OPA131 — Single, 4-MHz, 50-pA bias current, 750-µA power, FET operational amplifier OPA140 — Single-channel, 11-MHz, low-noise 36-V JFET precision operational Mar 17, 2019 · The OPA1641 would be slightly better. Don't let power supply current limitations get in the way of performance. Hi there probaly a simple question maybe not. Dec 6, 2018 · Tone controls? DAC reconstruction filter? The better FET-input op-amps are expensive because they are laser-trimmed and prices can be crazy. [/quote] I only have one piece of Behringer gear (an ultragain preamp without the tube). g. 1-nV/√ Hz noise density with an ultralow distortion of 0. Left channel is 5-10 dB better but there is also more variance between boards/opamps. Mar 19, 2005 · I tested the opa2134 vs the ad712 that were stock. According to the datasheets for both May 9, 2023 · Hello together, i want to put one of the mentioned OP Amps in my amp. AD8620 vs. And it is a JFET opamp, which is always preferred by myself in the positions where slightly higher voltage noise of the opamp is negligible, like here. Currently, I require opamps in the DIP package. The key feature of the OPA2134 Op-Amp is its ultra-low distortion and low-noise design, specifically tailored for audio applications. A question for opamp gurus. Apr 30, 2007 · Originally Posted by mikeg88 /img/forum/go_quote. It was recently re-capped and all new guts put in . It appears that the OPA1611/2 have a lower noise voltage, wider bandwidth and higher slew rate than the OPA134 and OPA2134's. Feb 11, 2021 · According to the TI datasheets OPA1612 has less noise than OPA1656. Joined 2022. It sounds swell but I have a set of the higher performance LMA49720NA DIP-8 opamps here on my desk and I'm wondering if they're plug-in compatible. OPA1612 sounds better than any transistor preamp I've ever heard and better then my own 6N6P 2 case -no barrels hold- 36kg monster preamp with a 100% double blind test win rate. There's been quite a bit of discussion of the comparative merits of the OPA2134 vs the OPA2604 recently. I plan to get the brown dog adapters and try the opa 627's soon. Apr 11, 2024 · Conclusion of OPA2134 VS NE5532 . hi i wanted to know if anybody have used the above opamps. I don't like OPA2134 much, so something like AD8620 would have been another good comparison to Burson. Aug 4, 2018 · ★更正muses 8920為new jrc公司出品(rca line in 至 zoom h4n)opa2134 hot swing 0:59opa2604 hot swing 1:47opa8920 hot swing 2:36----- 我想升级音频放大器 opa2134、ti 网站再次命令我更改新的 opa。 我发现 opa1612是 soundplus 终极产品系列中的一款产品、这就是我对它进行更改的原因。 遗憾的是、对于新的 opa1612、我在输出通道上获得了大量噪声。 我尝试使用 ne5532p 等低成本组件、无噪声、opa2134无 高音質電源改善アクセサリーを中心に、音響を中心に電気で世の中に貢献しています。. Alessandro MS-1, Sennheiser HD595, Audio Technica A500, Koss KSC-75, Etymotic ER6i, Sennheiser HD201 Jan 30, 2002 · OPA2134 vs OPA2604 vs OPA637. OPA2134 gain stage with voltage series feedback. If the customer is not swinging the signal this high on the output then this consideration doesn't matter but I should bring it up as a consideration. 2. Dec 18, 2002 · AD8620 vs. While the OPA2134 offers superior performance in terms of lower noise,deformation, and potentially advanced bandwidth, it comes with an advanced price label. Part Number: OPA1612 Other Parts Discussed in Thread: OPA2134, , OPA1678 Hi Community, TI!!! I would like to upgrade an audio amplifier OPA2134 and the TI site web recommands me to change for a new OPA. Also with some Keller Williams live recordings (Live at the Vic Theatre, Chigaco, 2002), the sound seemed to be quite far away, as if you were listening to small speaker box 2m in front of you. OPA2134 and NE5532 both have power supply currents of about 4mA per channel, and have been widely adopted in the market (understatement). I no nothing about this. I am curious to see if this impression changes over the week. At the risk of immediately coming across as exaggerated and/or hyped -- the "battle" was simply an epic slaughter! Sep 15, 2018 · "OPA1612 is better than OPA2134. I have a 1988 carver stereo per-amplifier. Noise level is basically the same in LM4562 and NE5532, while OPA2134 is 2 dB weaker. A quick snapshot of the OPA1656 performance specs: The OPA1611 (single) and OPA1612 (dual) bipolar-input operational amplifiers achieve very low 1. 4" plug). Part Number: OPA2134 Other Parts Discussed in Thread: OPA1678, OPA1611, OPA1602, OPA1642. Apparently it's harder to work with, but i haven't gotten a chance to try it yet. So I can use any one of these ( one at a time !). Jul 22, 2022 · OPA2134 is great for buffer and clean applications but I never liked it for overdrive/distortion. 00008% but in my area I can't find OPA2134. Member. Which of the two mentioned OP Amps (OPA1612 or OPA1656) is the better one, in a scientific point of view. OPA2134 costs an arm and a leg. Goes to show you how good it really is. Feb 11, 2021 · I'll look at it if you know of one amp using OPA1612 sounding audibly better than another amp using cheaper op amp in objective listening comparison. so far I note that the ad8610 seemed to go deeper in the bass and is a little warmer overall than the ad825. May 23, 2018 · What are your thoughts on OPA1622 vs OPA1612? Last edited: Sep 18, 2019. Now they seems to have changed again to opa1612 in many places - maybe a suggestion to try ? I have tried ne5532, opa2604, lm4562 and opa1612 and I prefered LM 4562 in both Aiyima a07 and the tpa3251-based Aiyima a04. Thread starter Tieftoener; Start date 2002-12-18 4:47 am; Status This old topic is closed. 6SL7 tube SRPP gain stage with voltage shunt feedback. Can anyone suggest drop-in replacements to OPA2134? I'm looking for a natural, transparent sound vs colored. " Jan 8, 2017 · Below are THD+N vs. Part Number: OPA1656. 5V inside of the positive rail . forami. TL072 works most of the time but I almost always find a better substitute in dirt pedals. I've replaced the old TL082 in my active crossover with opa2134. But now I have to replace them. The OPA1611 and OPA1612 offer rail-to-rail output swing to within 600 mV with a 2-kΩ load, which increases headroom and maximizes dynamic range. It offers exceptional performance in almost any audio application. Equipment Forums. The OPA1656 immediately raised my attention, plus there was/is a long thread about it on diyaudio. It has OPA2604 buffer amps that many have replaced with dual OPA627BP's with good results. The OPA1612 is used by Topping/SMSL and I believe Gustard is using it too and also in the Latest Topping Preamp that everyone is gossiping about…. In conclusion, the comparison between OPA2134 and NE5532 reveals two protean functional amplifiers suitable for a wide range of audio operations. It has the most stable input capacitance vs. That seemed like a reasonable target for the supply current of the OPA1656 as well. And without mentioning every op amp in existence, I'll close with I yet have to find a circuit where an NE5532 is the best possible option. I replaced my ad8610 I/Vs with ad 825s last night. 5 mA. Although many people dismiss the NE5532 as an obsolete component and try to locate a replacement, the NE5532 is still adequate for most applications. Apr 21, 2019 · vs Burson V6 Vivid The V6 Vivid has a faster attack than the classic, but still not quite as fast as the SS360x which allows the SS360x to wring out just slightly more detail than the Vivids. Nov 19, 2014 · opa1612 与 . The different players sounded different. But $40-57 each. Jun 18, 2019 · Hello everyone, I have the DAC Emotiva XDA-1 preamp with the DAC Analog Devices AD1955 and Burr Brown OPA-2134 op-amps, I want to update to the Burson Audio Play with the DAC: ESS Technology SABRE32 / ESS9018 and NE5532 X 3, NE554 X 2 op-amps, would it be a good update to the Burson Audio? thank you very much to all. Stimulated by a recent thread about opamps, I went back and compared again BB OPA2134 and OPA2604 in my Lehman Black Cube phono amp. Thread starter forami; Start date 2022-05-15 10:48 am; Jump to Latest F. We get lower current noise and better EMI resistence. I would recommend OPA2134 or OPA134 and if you have money the OPA627 or OPA637. The sound is much better but there's still something a bit "hi-fi" and "grey" in the presentation. But that does not say anything about the SQ. Desktop: S-Audio Focus 2 + NiNO Final Carbon Mk3. Have you found Dec 3, 2018 · Either one is overkill, but the difference could be in the speed of the opamp, they could be oscillating at very high frequencies, and/or operate outside of spec limits (the OPA2134 is unity gain stable, not sure if the OPA2604 is, and I am not sure what gain they are used in this circuit). 1 Portable: AK100-II + Dita Truth. 3. Aug 24, 2012 · #1. max Vos of 0. 000015% at 1 kHz. ナチュラルビューティー。脚色がほとんどない、いわば素肌美人である。音の抜けが良く、ジャンルを問わず使える感じ。超高域の解放感はもう一歩か。でも、充分リファレンス用途までいける。単価も音質の割に破格と言っていいだろう。 Jan 6, 2010 · I have an Onix XCD-99 which is basically a Music Hall CD-25. In other words, OPAx132PA and OPAx132UA (standard grades) are equivalent to OPAx134, which does NOT have a high grade. The OPA 627 is well over price and is bass heavy and it’s not worth the price you pay for it The OPA1612 and OPA827 are much better than any of these but these are SOIC and you’ll need an adapter with experience soldering skills. Apr 19, 2024 · The OPA2134 is a dual-package operational amplifier, which means it contains two independent Op-Amps. I want to use NE5532 instead. Jan 7, 2002 · Thanks for the reply though, I checked it out and noticed the comment on the OPA2604 needing more juice, so I checked out the spec sheet at TI, and it seems like it'll like anything from +/-15V to +/-24V, while the OPA2134 only likes up to +/-18V (pretty close to the -17V of my power suply), so I think I'll feel safer going with the OPA2604 regardless. Using hd600s and 400is to test them Ive compared the Jan 28, 2018 · I had the chance to gather up a selection of opamps from my parts bin, including BB OPA2604, OPA637, AD823, LME49860, JR4556, Muses8820 and 8920, and compare them against each other along with a Burson V6 Classic (thanks to them for sending me an evaluation). But I couldn't find anything about NE5532 THD in Datasheet. Anything other than these values and they're either fake or damaged (or both). The main difference between OPAx132 and OPAx134 is in DC precision of the high grade of OPAx2132P/U and OPA2134 (e. OPA134 . OPA2604 is a little bit faster. 4 mA, max. Although I am a fan of the OPA2134, I still have very considerable respect for the NE5532. Sep 7, 2024 · G'day all, an interesting thread. One other very noteworthy difference is the Vivid has a strong attack, but loses a bit on the decay so sustain is better on the SS360x. The new national opamps are also there with extreme slew rate of 1900v/usec just like AD815. OPA2134 is more stable, as it is not too fast for Audio. The OPA-2132 & OPA-2134 sound Dull and Vailed to me. Mar 25, 2022 · Conclusion of OPA2134 VS NE5532 The OPA2134 is a Fet Input op-amp, while the NE5532 is a Bipolar Input op-amp. Opa2134 is a very good opamp. Jan 10, 2016 · He talked to me about OPA1611's versus OPA134's as well as the OPA1612's versus OPA2134's. When we developed the OPA1656, this was also a major design target for us, and the designer and myself spent quite awhile in the lab with previous CMOS audio op amps (specifically OPA1652 and OPA1688) hunting for sources of input capacitance variation. Nov 8, 2006 · OPA2134 and OPA2604 are very close in data. May 5, 2002 · ad825 vs ad8610 Hi Fmak, thanks for all the ongoing help. Mar 22, 2022 · The OPA1612 is one of the best I’ve ever encountered, the LME 49720 are hard to beat at any price……. OPA134. Apr 1, 2012 · Howdy. Jan 7, 2021 · So considering NE5532, LM4562 and OPA2134, OPA2134 gives best measured results in AIYIMA A07. I know there are a lot of factors that set these apart, but I'm writing to ask what difference the amp modules make. com with a TI insider involved. Nov 9, 2012 · Muses02 vs BB OPA2134 in Topping A30 (single-ended to differential buffer) Rig includes: Topping A30 and D30, HD600s (vintage 2017) with HD650 (genuine Sennheiser replacement part) 3m cable (1. Other Parts Discussed in Thread: OPA2134, OPA2604. Jun 16, 2015 · The two Op-amps mentioned in the video are the Burr Brown dual op-amp OPA2134PA in the cream painted build and the jrc4558 in the silver build. I have a phono preamp board with three socketed DIP-8 OPA2134 in it. May 29, 2021 · With the Burson V5i-D in my collection now, I have four sets of OPAMPs for my xDuoo XD05 Bal, OPA1612 stock OPAMP, JRC 5532D stock replacement OPAMP, OPA2134(purchased aftermarket), Burson V5i-D. I just thought using two opa627, i will achieve 2134's audio quality. OPA2604 is one of the few op-amps having +24 -24 max supply voltage. Another way to say it: JFET OPamps like OPA2134 can replace most any other audio opamp Jan 11, 2016 · Yes sir. Thanks in Jun 6, 2012 · 7 mA quiescent current is typical of the OPA627, for the OPA2132 it should be typ. Oct 31, 2012 · MUSES 8920 vs Burr-Brown OPA2134 Home. I am sure that the overall results are going to be context specific, but thought an additional comparison might prove useful. Apr 7, 2007 · It seems to miss a certain slam I had with the opa2132, might be because of the lower output current it can supply, 16 vs 40mA. If you want to reopen this topic Oct 5, 2005 · 2134 vs 2132 looking back i'd go with the 2134, it's so much cheaper and sounds the same. Prodigy 205 points. Posted by Ehien (A) on January 30, 2002 at 11:22:50 . Mar 11, 2003 · 1. Forums. It is solid, sturdy with an aluminum casing at the top. common mode voltage that I've measured on any op amp. Mar 17, 2019 · 3. I don't care about listening tests or something else, just want to use the technical better one in my amp. gif Okay so I've been comparing the micro stack, ultra micro stack and the basic desktop amps. 魅族mx4pro运放芯片用的是1612，而xplay 3s用2604，不知道魅族能不能比vivo更屌呢？ 貌似老外们觉得2604比较好有助攻的么 OPA1612 与 OPA2604 对比？ opa2134. How are LME49860, LME49720 etc? Are they drop-in Dec 11, 2019 · Normally you'd regularily search in the manufacturers new product listings first for any new interesting products. While it still has some treble sparkle, It isn't enough to save its sound of complete mudyness and lack of detail. (Opa2134 is not broken in at all, so it will most likely get better w/time) The base is much better from the 2134, but it does not seem to be as powerful on the output side, but could just be the break-in needed. I would say it depends on what circuit. Apr 6, 2020 · The OPA2134 is very ordinary, I consider it a side step to the NE5532. Out of all four of these, the V5i-D has the best build quality. I replaced those in my motu 828 with LM4562, sound improved remarkably. Nov 25, 2015 · Im interested in op amp rolling for my amp since its not expensive to try out and I was surprised to find a lot of variation between them, the amp has a very simple circuit so my results could be more siginificant than with other amps. The ad825 seems to be more detailed alright. These two OP amp has great impact on performance so we don't want our users to change it. Jun 7, 2016 · OPA1612 1612 will sound warmer, thicker, mellower and darker with most headphones and IEMs. Now all the folks are using opa2134 op -amps as the replacement. A Jul 29, 2002 · Haha, in fact, it makes you wonder if a "better" opamp will yield just as much (or more) improvements over Burson. Oct 8, 2017 · So I just blew up 5 Burr Brown OPA2134 due to bad labelling on the PCB (Ok I was also supposed to be more careful). The other OPA2134 is for I/V convert. Mar 9, 2023 · SMSL SU-10 vs M500 MKIII vs DO300 21 vs 9 vs 11 dual op-amps OPA1612 (accoring to the spec from smsl-audio) What is the Op-amps doing in that? M500 SINAD is higher than DO300 with less op-amps. The soundstage is the only good part, it's the wider due to the bass boost and upper midrange scoop. . In fact, dual OPA627 on Browndogs would have been something to consider as well. :thumb: I'm not an opamp expert, but it looks like LM4562 is the newest opamp out there, correct me if I'm wrong. I was wondering if the OPA2604's could be replace with a dual opamp like the OPA1612 with similar or hopefully better results than the OPA627's Other Parts Discussed in Thread: OPA1612, OPA1642, RC4136 I use these amplifiers for pro audio. Two cases were evalutated – in a The OPA134, OPA2134, and OPA4134 (OPAx134) series are ultra-low distortion, low-noise operational amplifiers fully specified for audio applications. amplitude for all opamps (with 560 ohm shunt resistors). Feb 16, 2007 · HiI am building a 3-way active cross over circuit. Portable Headphone Amps. Jun 20, 2001 · Neruda: You want Treble, More Treble than you are used to then use an AD-823 for the gain Opamp and the LM-6172,s as the Output Buffer. May 15, 2022 · LME49720 vs OPA1612 vs Muses02. 8 mA, for the OPA2134 typ. The OPA1656 is the industry’s lowest voltage noise high voltage CMOS on the market. Goggle bill d mod carver c-1. The AD826 seems to be smoother than the OPA in the voice range. the design is based on opa2134 Dual OpAmp Which has a THD=0. +Gain Bandwidth. It's a killer OpAmp, and better suited to Dec 22, 2016 · OPA2134 vs OPA2604 vs OPA2107. The OPA1611 (single) and OPA1612 (dual) bipolar-input operational amplifiers achieve very low 1. If anything, it has a more 'neutral' sound than the (possibly slightly euphonic) OPA2134, but its performance is very reliable and dependable and of a very high standard, which possibly explains its long standing use in 'professional' audio gear. Though we did not test it before but we believe OPA1612 is a better choice. Thread starter theque; Start date Nov 21, 2012; Tags headphone-amplifiers Jan 10, 2006 · [quote author="jackies"]It's said that NJM4580 is what creates signature blehringer sound. 4. 5mV vs 2mV, respectively). Posted by KanedaK (A) on December 22, 2016 at 16:38:35 . AD826 used instead of the the OPA2134. lvv egutwk cemj lvtnxs dvygcju eims andwli ukk knzr ekfa